Understanding Section 454 Penalty Order for XIE FUTEC AUTOMATION PRIVATE LIMITED

What Happened?

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) issued a penalty order to XIE FUTEC AUTOMATION PRIVATE LIMITED and its directors for violating Sections 92 and 137 of the Companies Act, 2013. These violations relate to the non-filing of annual returns and financial statements for four consecutive financial years: 2017–18, 2018–19, 2019–20, and 2020–21.

Let’s break down the key points in simple terms:

Why Was the Penalty Issued?

• Annual Returns (Section 92):

1. 1. • Companies must file an annual return summarizing their financial and managerial data within 60 days of the Annual General Meeting (AGM).
      • XIE FUTEC didn’t file its returns for four years, attracting penalties under Section 92(5).

• Financial Statements (Section 137):

1. • Financial statements must be submitted within 30 days of the AGM, or reasons for delays must be provided.
   • Failure to submit these statements over four years led to penalties under Section 137(3).

Key Highlights from the Order

• Adjudicating Officer’s Role:
  The MCA appointed an adjudicating officer to enforce compliance and impose penalties based on the Companies Act.
• Company Background:

1. 1. • XIE FUTEC is a private company based in Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, with an authorized capital of ₹20 lakhs.
      • Despite multiple notices, the company and its directors didn’t respond or resolve their non-compliance issues.

• Severity of Non-Compliance:

1. • Non-filing of returns prevents stakeholders, investors, and authorities from accessing the company’s financial and management details, which is a fundamental legal requirement.
   • Such actions undermine transparency, accountability, and public trust.

Penalties Imposed

The company and its directors were fined heavily, with penalties calculated based on the number of days the filings were overdue.

For Annual Returns (Section 92):

• Penalty for the company: ₹1,63,700 (FY 2017–18), ₹1,24,400 (FY 2018–19), and so on.
• Individual directors faced penalties capped at ₹50,000 per year.

For Financial Statements (Section 137):

• Penalty for the company: ₹1,63,700 (FY 2017–18), ₹1,27,400 (FY 2018–19), and so on.
• Managing Director’s penalty: ₹50,000 per year (maximum cap).

Total Penalty Amount: ₹18,63,400.

Next Steps for the Company

• Immediate Compliance:

1. 1. • The company and its directors must file the overdue returns and financial statements immediately.
      • Failure to comply may result in additional legal actions.

• Penalty Payment:

1. 1. • The fines must be paid via the MCA portal within 90 days of receiving the order.

• Right to Appeal:

1. • If the company or its directors disagree with the decision, they can file an appeal with the Regional Director (Southern Region) within 60 days.

Why Filing on Time is Crucial

• Filing annual returns and financial statements ensures transparency for stakeholders, regulators, and the general public.
• Compliance with the Companies Act avoids penalties, maintains the company’s reputation, and ensures smooth operations.

Final Note:
This case emphasizes the importance of meeting statutory deadlines and being responsive to regulatory notices. Companies must prioritize filing compliance to uphold their credibility and avoid unnecessary financial and legal burdens.

To know more in-depth, click here.

Stay tuned to InstaFinancials for the latest regulatory updates and insights.